
| December 2001 Volume 3, No. 4 |
Page
4
|
| EDITORIAL by Angel C. Alcala, Ph.D. |
Reclamation is NOT the Way to Go for Dumaguete
The modernization of the port facilities of Dumaguete City does not
require reclamation, contrary to the claims of the Philippine Ports Authority
(PPA). There are several reasons for this view and these have been thoroughly
discussed in a leaflet produced by the Citizens Alliance for Responsible Development
(CARD). The reasons include sharing of economic benefits, efficient use of
government resources, value systems of people of Dumaguete, informed decision-making,
environmental considerations, etc. In this brief note, I will summarize my
environmental concerns and those of my son, Moses, a professional environmental
geologist who holds a degree from the University of the Philippines and a
master’s degree in geology from the University of the City of New York.
Past experience in Dumaguete has shown that reclamation
in the Bohol Strait in connection with the lengthening of the airstrip in
the 1980s resulted in substantial erosion of the nearby Barangay Bantayan
coastline. To stop this erosion, Silliman University had to intervene by sinking
concrete piles along that badly eroded stretch of beach with a substantial
financial cost to the University.
Reclaiming the sea, as planned by PPA, is sure to alter
the course of strong long- shore currents moving along Tañon Strait and heading
to the Mindanao and Sulu Seas causing beach erosion due to scouring effects
on the shoreline, similar to the erosion of Bantayan Beach described above.
Dumaguete coastal outline (as seen from a map of Central
Visayas) is a landform similar to a “headland” that sticks out into the ocean,
in contrast to a concave shoreline such as a bay. Bays are ideal sites for
port development, but not headlands. Headlands are prone to erosion and destruction
by storms, waves, and ocean currents. Is it any wonder that, as PPA admits
in its “Beware of Environmentalists’ Scare” leaflet, the “port of Dumaguete,
being classified as tertiary port, ranks among the lowest in development priority
of the country’s twenty (22) (sic) principal ports of entry.” The question
is, why is Dumaguete port considered “lowest in priority”? I am almost
sure the answer is that Dumaguete is a poor location for a major shipping
or ferry port because it is located in a headland, unlike ports like Cebu
which are located in protected areas. There are other areas in Negros
Oriental that can be developed to become ports because they are situated in
embayments and hence are protected from climatic and oceanographic elements.
So why does PPA insist on developing Dumaguete port by reclaiming the sea?
The sea has been referred to as the last frontier on
earth for man to conquer in the quest for a steady food source in the future.
Unfortunately, this is no longer true; the sea has been ravaged slowly, little
by little, by unthinking people out to enjoy the benefits only for themselves.
At present, fisheries production by marine communities such as coral reefs
and mangroves has plummeted! And PPA justifies its port project by an outmoded
refrain “There is always a price to pay for any development.”
Well, I would like to remind our people that the potential
fishery catch from the more than one hectare of water planned to be reclaimed
is about 700,000 pesos a year, representing nature’s bounty without investment
on the part of government. Add to this the value of services in nursing fish
fry that will recruit to other places, valued for a similar amount to make
a total of 1.4 million pesos a year. These benefits from the environment are
not much from PPAs perspective, but they mean much to many of our poor people
who do not get the required dietary amount to maintain good health.
Why Foreign
Tourists Come to Negros Oriental
Why do foreign tourists come to Dumaguete and southern
Negros Oriental? The answer is, because they find natural attractions, beautiful
sceneries, aesthetically satisfying views of nature, and opportunities to
learn new things and to study the local environment.
What are the attractive things that Negros Oriental
offers to visitors? First, there is Apo Island, off Dauin, the pride of
the Philippines, where the coral reef ecosystem typical of reefs found in
the Indo-West Pacific region has been preserved, protected and maintained
for more than 20 years by the community of Apo Island and the local government
of Dauin municipality with the assistance of Silliman University. Here,
the visitors swim in the clear water and admire the varieties of fish and
other marine creatures including turtles, Spanish dancers, sea urchins,
sea squirts, coral colonies, etc., all set in their near pristine natural
environment which has developed in harmony with the seasons, the currents,
the waves, the tides for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. No wonder
these visitors willingly pay for the privilege of looking at a snapshot
of an unspoiled marine environment. Do you know that Apo earns no less than
$35,000 a year from divers’ fees alone and a total of $200,000 a year from
boat rentals, resort accommodation and high fish catches outside of their
marine sanctuary? This amount is exclusive of donations for scholarship
for Apo students. Apo Island earns because it has been protected! It is
to the credit of the provincial government that it has replicated the Apo
model of development in more than 20 sites in the province, where the natural
coastline and the underwater seascape are protected. Our lesson here is
that beautiful natural spots can be made to earn money for people.
Another site in Basay town has its own coral reef marine
reserve that was described in video by ABS/CBN recently. It has some natural
features that can attract tourists if the national road in the western part
of the island is maintained in good condition. In addition, Basay has limestone
caves harboring unique animals that evolved there over the last 1000 years
or so. The local government is protecting one such cave that was also featured
in video by ABS/CBN. These attractions have potentials to earn money for
the people in this municipality.
The Silliman Marine Laboratory runs educational exhibits
on the natural environment around Negros Oriental. These exhibits depict
the richness of our seas that is often ignored or taken for granted by people.
It is a joy to see truckloads of visitors, including tourists and students
coming from all parts of Negros, viewing these exhibits. It is also a tribute
to our foreign friends and supporters that they have invested funds in the
development of the laboratory to cater to the needs of scientists, Filipinos
and other nationalities alike. This facility came into being with little,
if any, indigenous support. Yet it serves Dumaguete, Negros Oriental, the
Philippines, and even the world. The impact of the Laboratory’s research
and educational program on the minds and values of students cannot be overemphasized.
We invite public officials to visit the Laboratory to know more about the
environment of the province. I am sure they will learn new things.
Foreign tourists do not come to the Philippines to
see piles of uncollected garbage and trash on the streets. They hate to
see ugly man-made alterations of the natural environment. They do not want
to breathe polluted air and to drink water with amoebae. They do not come
to find out how good are our hotels, our public buildings, our piers, our
ports, etc. They do not want to see unnatural, man-made structures like
reclamations. They do not like to see dredged portions of coastlines. They
do not like to see structures that interfere with natural processes. They
in fact do not care much for infrastructures, as these are common in their
own countries. They prefer to sleep in airy bamboo huts or even on open
sandy beaches. They want to see new things, those they do not see or have
in their countries. They would like to see different plants, different animals,
different forests, unique rock formations.
Does anyone still wonder why tourism is directly dependent
on the high quality of the environment? Does anyone still doubt the economic
value of a protected environment?
Reply to Philippine
Ports Authority
I would like to reply to the comments of PPA on two
issues dealt with in my earlier note: (1) the seaward extension of the airstrip
which has been shown to cause beach erosion, and (2) the pollution of the
marine water in front of the boulevard.
It is a fact that beach erosion has occurred because
of the seaward extension of the airstrip. The main point here is that building
structures along coastlines causes the alteration of the direction, velocity
and other characteristics of ocean currents, which may in turn cause unwanted
effects on the shoreline. In the case of the airstrip, its extension caused
accelerated erosion of Silliman beach. I am glad that PPA implied agreement
with this cause and effect relationship. Invoking the observed effect mentioned
above and the generally accepted precautionary principle, I am opposed to
reclamation and I am predicting a similar effect of the proposed reclamation.
The burden of proof that the proposed reclamation will not cause unwanted
effects is with the PPA!
The second
argument of PPA is that since the seawater being proposed for reclamation
is polluted, it is suitable for reclamation. Pollution is a side issue. It
must be dealt with separately and is not relevant to the issue at hand. The
proper solution to the problem of water pollution is for Dumaguete City to
install a secondary treatment for sewage and domestic wastes. Pollution cannot
justify reclamation in this case!
A book entitled Harvesting Polluted Waters
(1976, Plenum Press, New York) contains several articles on the use of polluted
waters for aquaculture and mariculture purposes. If one believes what the
expert authors of the various articles in this volume are saying, he can conclude
that polluted waters are not that bad after all. Polluted waters may be productive
of certain organisms like fish and shellfish, although it must be admitted
these waters have a low species richness because only tolerant species are
found in them. Biological studies have demonstrated that there are such species
in our own seas. For example, one of the Marine Laboratory’s technicians,
Dan Catada, used to catch large batfishes and rabbitfishes
in the pier area. The water of the pier area, though polluted to a certain
degree, harbors fishes. The reason is that water in the pier area circulates,
and being continuous with the open sea, allow certain marine species, especially
highly mobile fishes, to enter the area to exploit food sources. Pollutants
are exported through ocean currents to the open sea and do not remain permanently
in the water. So after all, like what the book says, polluted waters in the
Dumaguete pier area can be harvested, of course with proper safeguards.
The predicted potential fish productivity of one kilogram
per square meter per year of shallow waters that I quoted earlier was based
on the figures gathered from artificial reefs installed by the Central Visayas
Regional Project in the mid-1980s and data of the Bureau of Fisheries and
Aquatic Resources. A full documentation of the productivity of artificial
reefs is given in the newsletter UNOS vol. 4, no. 1, 2001, published
by the Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Research and Development,
Los Baños, Laguna.
I hope that our Dumaguete people will look at the issue
of pier reclamation in terms of overall development and benefits, not just
the income that will go, not to Dumaguete, but toward the national government.
Choose
a Newsletter below and click
GO.
|
|
|
|
|
Links: |
|
![]() |
|
|
CHED-SU Zonal Research Center Education Newsletter |
|
|
|
Silliman University Website |